Hunkabutta Archives
01.13.03

click to enlarge      
click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

Japan has finally discovered a solution to the age-old problem of what to do with used tires, the answer: Turn them in to park toys. This idea is definitely a keeper. I now realise that it's my destiny to return to Canada and become the 'Tire Park King'.

I took the pictures in today's post at a playground in Kamata (South Tokyo) made up almost entirely of old tires of every shape and size. There were fat tires and skinny tires, monster-sized mining truck tires and little mini moped tires. Some tires where hung on chains, while others were buried in the ground. There were towering stacks of tires in the shape of fantastic creatures, and disordered heaps of tires for improvised, creative use.

In Canada we do one of two things with our old tires: We either stash them in obscure rural towns, like an old lady with a deformed child hidden in the basement, or else we burn them en masse in order to create truly world class ecological disasters.

Does anybody remember Hagersville? We dumped more than 14 million used tires on that little town before they caught on fire.

And I just sit here and think, "Man! What I could do with 14 million tires!" I could build the Disneyland of tire parks. Say goodbye to Canada's Wonderland, hello to 'Tire World'. I can just see it now: A post apocalyptic theme; employees dressed like rejects from a Mad Max movie; the heady scent of slow-release chemical compounds; thousands of little black-stained hands and rubber-burned knees.

Who could ask for more? Fun through reuse!

-------------------------------

In other site news, nominations are now open for the first annual 'Photoblog' awards.

This is a great idea and a good thing for the photoblog community, so go there now, nominate your favourite blogs, and make sure to return in February to cast your votes.

Comments?
10 comments so far

01.11.03

click to enlarge      
click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

I have the most amazing Tokyo map book, it's called the Tokyo City Atlas: A Bilingual Guide. The maps are beautifully formatted, it's concise yet complete, and I carry it with me everywhere I go. Maybe it's odd, but I've always had a thing for atlases and dictionaries.

I was thinking about how much I like my map book because I used it today to go exploring with Jack. We went for a long walk in the neighbourhood. I wanted to take some pictures and give Karen some time alone.

I often go exploring. I always have. When I'm free I'll just go walking in a direction that I've never taken before. I also like to take alternative routes to and from work and home, just for variety's sake. And do you know what? I don't think that I've ever been lost. I guess that I have a good sense of direction.

Have you ever wondered what a 'sense of direction' is? And why some people seem to have it while others don't?

I've thought about it and haven't found the answer, but I have noticed one thing, that people tend to navigate in one of two basic ways: By landmarks and by an abstract mental map. People tend to mix methods to some degree but generally favour one over the other. Furthermore, I've noticed that there is a gender bias (and please don't write to me and call me a chauvinist), women tend to navigate using landmarks and men tend to navigate using an abstract mental map and the cardinal directions (i.e, North, South,....).

I think that it's pretty clear what I mean by 'navigating using landmarks', but you may be confused by the meaning of abstract mental map. I'm very much an abstract-map guy so I'll try to explain to you how my mind works.

Wherever I am I'm aware of the general direction of a major natural feature or section of the city. I also have a clear idea of the relationship, in terms of distance and direction, between different parts of the city. For example, when I'm in Toronto I always know in which direction, more or less, Lake Ontario is, and that that's South. As I walk and progress through the landscape my mind floats high above me and looks down upon where I am as if I were a dot on a paper map. As I turn left and right I always reorient myself. Once again in Toronto, if I'm walking down Queen street and I know that the lake is somewhere in the distance to my right, when I later turn left on Yonge street I know that the lake is now at my back.

I once lived in Vancouver and had a girlfriend who grew up there. She knew the city extremely well. One day we had to go to the airport to meet someone and she was going to drive. We were at a friend's house downtown and were about to leave for the airport when she told me something that I found hard to understand: "I don't know how to get there from here."

I said, "What are you talking about? I know you've been to the airport before, lots of times, what do you mean you don't know how to get there?"

She replied, "I've only ever gone to the airport from my house in the suburbs, I don't know how to get there from downtown."

She knew where the airport was, and she knew where she was, but she couldn't connect the two points in her mind. To her, going to the airport meant following a set of known streets and landmarks. Needless to say, I navigated to the airport that day.

There are good and bad things about both navigation methods. Some of the good things about using an abstract mental map are, 1) the ability to get to known places via a novel route, 2) less of a chance of getting lost in new territory, and 3) it makes getting around in cities laid out in grid patterns a piece of cake.

Some of the good things about relying on landmarks are, 1) easily backtracking to find your way home (good for foreign cities), 2) it's better for giving directions to other people, and 3) it's good for navigating cities with unsymmetrical layouts.

Anyway, if tomorrow is nice Jack and I may go out and take some more pictures. When he gets older I'm going to buy him a compass, just so he can navigate himself like his good ole dad.

Comments?
18 comments so far

01.08.03

click to enlarge      
click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

I witnessed my second crime in Japan yesterday, and it was particularly Japanese: I saw a man playing shogi for money run from the police.

What's shogi? And, why did the man run?

Shogi is a Japanese board game very much like chess. And the man ran because gambling is illegal in Japan (more or less).

It happened like this. Outside the South exit of Shibuya station is a huge network of pedestrian overpasses that allow people to get to the other side of a major road. The main overpass network is in the shape of a square, it's above a busy road, and below an enormous raised expressway. Every morning I use this pedestrian overpass to get to my office.

Yesterday as I walked up the stairs on the Northeast corner, I noticed that a shifty looking homeless man was loitering at the top of the steps. He was nervously looking in turn down each of the two walkways that met at that corner. First he'd look down one way, then turn his head and look down the other way, then turn back and look down the first way again, over and over.

I walked passed the homeless man and didn't think much of it. I was about three quarters the way down the walkway when suddenly he ran past me at a frantic pace.

Just up ahead of me, at the other corner of the walkway, was a group of middle-age men standing around a shogi board that rested on a tall collapsible stand. The homeless man was waving his arms and shouting. He was their lookout. Someone grabbed the playing board and dumped it in a shopping bag. Another man undid a latch on the stand, collapsed it, and stuck it in his coat. Everyone dispersed in different directions. Everything happened in a matter of seconds.

At that point I still wasn't exactly sure what was going on, but then out of nowhere two foot cops appeared behind me walking their beat. They hadn't seen a thing.

The shogi man may have lost his customers, but I know that he went on to play shogi for money another day.

Comments?
12 comments so far

01.05.03

click to enlarge      
click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

I'd like to say hello to all of you new Hunkabutta visitors coming here from CBCradio3.com.

The people at CBC were kind enough to use some Hunkabutta pictures in the current issue of their weekly online magazine. For those of you not from Canada, CBC stands for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. It's a government owned media company, a lot like the BBC in England.

If you click on the link above to visit the CBC radio3 web site, be warned that it's a high bandwidth, Flash animation site. What this means is that you may not be able to view the site if you connect to the Internet via a slow dial-up telephone connection (that means you Mom) because it would take a really long time for each page to load into your web browser. However, give it a try if you like, it may work anyway.

The site is pretty slick but a little confusing to navigate at first. It's structured somewhat like a print magazine. You initially get taken to the 'front cover' where you can follow links to various articles. There is a table of contents page that you can return to by clicking a link on the left side of every page. You 'turn' each page by clicking on a triangular icon in the upper right-hand corner of the screen that is supposed to represent a dog-eared page corner.

My pictures are interspersed throughout the various articles. There are about 15 in all. They're also listed and accessible as a group from the table of contents on the right-hand side.

As you might have guessed, I'm not really much of a fan of Flash animation sites. They often seem to have unorthodox and confusing navigation patterns. On the upside, the photos are shown full screen in high resolution and look really sharp.

Hope you like them. Thanks again CBC.

Comments?
10 comments so far